New Hampshire policy, followed through to the outcome.
Place
Part of Sullivan County · New Hampshire
A Sullivan County community.
No analysis is filed under Cornish yet. Related coverage is listed below.
These name Cornish but are not filed as analysis of it. Being named is not a measured local effect.
A public dashboard now shows Education Freedom Account participation by municipality. It does not show what the accounts changed — and the statewide reporting that would answer that question does not exist.
A comparison of two decisions by the representative for Sullivan County District 7: a bill that would have moved $28 million of pension cost off local property taxes, and an expansion of state education spending to $51.6 million.
Filed under Sullivan County, or under another community in it. They are not analysis of Cornish and do not measure an effect on Cornish specifically.
So New Hampshire has a formula designed to compensate for differences in fiscal capacity while simultaneously relying increasingly on the revenue source whose capacity varies most dramatically from town to town. That tension is at the center of the funding debate.
This isn’t a debate about saving homeowners $50 or $100. For Claremont, shifting even part of the state’s current contribution back onto the local tax base could mean four-figure annual increases for an ordinary homeowner.
Two towns can need the same money per student and set very different tax rates, because the property standing behind each student is different.
A four-town comparison of property value per student, operating cost per pupil and the resulting education tax rate.
Statewide coverage that applies to every New Hampshire community is on the New Hampshire page (15 analyses).